DeLanda’s War in the Age of Intelligent Machines (1991) is nominally an examination of the role of information technology in military history, but is really an examination of social-military morphogenesis, as with, for example, Napoleon’s military mobilization of the citizenry created by the French Revolution. DeLanda is careful to note, however, that his application of nonlinear dynamics findings in physics and biology to social systems remains analogical, and not yet scientific, as mathematical models of sufficient complexity to analyze social systems have yet to be developed.
In A Thousand Years of Nonlinear History (1999), DeLanda widens
his field of vision to examine economics, biology, and linguistics. DeLanda
appeals to nonlinear dynamics researches and Deleuzoguattarian terminology
to move from the geological to the social, investigating the interplay
of ‘the flows of lava, biomass, genes, memes, norms, money,’ out of which
come the
stable and semi-stable structures of the natural and social world.
Relying on the historians Ferdnand Braudel and William McNeill, the biologists
Stuart Kaufmann and Brian Goodwin, and the linguists William Labov and
Zelig Harris, DeLanda distinguishes ‘hierarchies’ and ‘meshworks’ (interactive
networks, or what Deleuze and Guattari call ‘rhizomes’) as two basic
structural forms found in many natural and social registers (although
never purely, but always in mixed form).
In Intensive Science and Virtual Philosophy (2002), DeLanda continues
with the topic of morphogenesis, but this time in the guise of a 'reconstruction'
of Deleuze’s Difference and Repetition that explains the mathematical
background of Deleuze’s ontology and epistemology. DeLanda explains Deleuze’s
ontology as anti-essentialist, that is, as insisting on tracing the
genesis of actual forms from intensive material processes (those that
change their nature when pushed beyond critical thresholds); the virtual
realm is made up of the repeatable structures of such processes. The Deleuzean
‘ontological difference’ is produced by the purification of mathematical
concepts, which eliminates any reference to identity to produce a pure
differential virtual field. For DeLanda, Deleuzean epistemology asks us
to treat physics problematically rather than axiomatically. In this approach,
the achievements of theoretical physics are seen not as linguistically
interpreted general laws, but as correctly posed problems, that is, as
the posing of the distribution of what is singular and ordinary (i.e.,
what is important and not). DeLanda’s reconstruction thus stresses that
Deleuzean ontology discloses not a closed world capturable by sentences,
but an open world to be explored.
[497 words]